Re: A83: Re: Re: Assembly-83 Digest V1 #913
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: Re: Re: Assembly-83 Digest V1 #913
Remember, there is _quite_ a difference between simple opcode to bytecode
translation (ala DOS debug) and an assembler.
> Actually I created one in basic that I didn't finish
> entirely. (Trying to remember, its been 3 years
> almost) I basically stored everything to a string with
> a nice input routine and stored a : inbetween the
> commands, and then when you decided to compile it, I
> just checked the string for commands (starts with L so
> go here, check next letter, ect...) It was slow and
> pretty much sucked parsing wise but it worked for a
> lot of the commands. It also checked for errors and
> told you what it couldn't compile (unknown commands
> ect...)
>
> I actually wrote this program before I new a lick of
> spit about asm though, so some of my things may have
> been wrong.
> I actually didn't release all of it either, Later I
> had created a asm program that took your generated
> code and stuck it into a program for you to run, with
> the name you wanted, ect...
>
> I thought about making an asm one, hell I even
> started it but I stopped after I decided that it was
> useless. One screw up and boom, you have to start
> over. (Unless you made a crash protector but still
> implausible for the 83)
References: