A83: Re: Re: Poll
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A83: Re: Re: Poll
You're right, you can only type on existing lines and the one past that.
My program will be for the 82 and 83(+). The tenative name is "K-Edit".
Right now, the way I have tabs implemented is like the second method I described. If enough people want it like the
first method, I'll try to change it. It would require a lot of modification to the code I've already written though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 16:17
Subject: A83: Re: Poll
<snip>
> I am trying to incorporate the best features of each into my program.
> For example, Edit has a free moving cursor. That is, you can move the
cursor to any part of the screen and just start
> typing away. But in Notepad, the cursor must follow the text. You can't
just click at a point on the screen and start
> typing there. However having the cursor follow the text is sometimes
better for browsing through files. So which style
> would you prefer? I can do either. Right now I'm doing the Notepad style,
so if more people would rather have the Edit
> style, tell me now!
That's not entirely true. For notepad, you can only add new text somewhere
in an existing line, or at the end of a line. With DOS edit, you can start
adding text anywhere in the middle of a line, and it will automatically fill
the line with spaces to that point from the old end of line. It also has an
extra blank line past the current end of file. You cannot just start adding
text _anywhere_. Only on existing lines and one line past that.
> Edit doesn't have a word wrap feature, but Notepad does. I've already
included a word wrap feature in my program.
> Notepad has selectable fonts, Edit doesn't. My program has two selectable
fonts, and both have full ASCII character
> sets.
Is this for the calc?
> Edit has selectable tab sizes. Notepad doesn't. Right now my program has
tabs fixed at 8 spaces. If enough people want
> it, I'll try to make it variable though.
There are at least two ways to implement tabs. The first way, that DOS edit
uses, is to simply insert spaces for the tab size. As you'll notice in DOS
edit, you cannot backspace or cursor through tabs. And, when you change the
tab size, current tabs stay the same. I like this behavior, unless of
course I have to open a program that used the other method. The second
method is to use the actual tab character and store that, in which case you
just display the text with spaces for the tab size. This has the advantage
of letting you delete entire tabs and cursor through them. The major
disadvantage is that if you open the text in a different program that uses
different tab sizes, it is totally screwed. Might be nice to implement both
:)
<snip>
References: