A83: Re: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A83: Re: _zeroop1 vs. _zerooop1
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Verzonden: zaterdag 26 februari 2000
12:35
Onderwerp: A83: _zeroop1 vs.
_zerooop1
Dose any one know the differens between =he to
rom calls mentioned
below
_zeroop1 = 41c5h
_zerooop1 = 428eh
There is no such thing as a _zeroop1-romcall in the ti83
include file. By the way,
is '_zerooop1' a typo for the romcall that should have been
named '_zeroop1'? I
mean, the third 'o' just doesn't seem to make sense to me....
What I do is equate
'_zeroop1' to the adress of '_zerooop1' in every program I
write that uses it. Utterly
useless, but it just feels better :)
Arnout
References: