Re: A83: rom redundancy
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: rom redundancy
In a message dated 29/04/00 21:01:46 GMT Daylight Time,
lairfight@softhome.net writes:
>> If you didn't have a vector table then the routine would have to be at
$268 ;
>> if you wanted the preceding routine to be two bytes longer you'd then have
>> mayhem.
>>
>> For an extreme example, look at the Amiga.
>>
> eh... bZZZZZZZZt! You just hurt my feelings. :-P
No, I think its a neat solution ; I've owned 2 Amigas
myself. However, it is a great example of not having
absolute addresses for entries.
Follow-Ups: