Re: A83:STILL NEED HELP!

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83:STILL NEED HELP!
From: Scott Dial <wrath@calc.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 23:00:44 -0500
Organization: ByMe Inc. Technologies \ TCPA
References: <Pine.LNX.4.02.9910242027270.8429-100000@binx.mbhs.edu> <3813A84F.7FFBEFDD@hem.passagen.se>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


Hmm... would you like it better if it sat inline?

Olle Hedman wrote:
> 
> Yes it is.  It is very inefficient to have it in a subroutine in the first
> place.  just jump to a subroutine and ret is 17+10 clocks.
> this routine you have made will mostly ret after the  the second try, so your
> total delay will be 17+11+4+12+11+4+7+10=76 clocks...
> (assuming that the number of clocks "needed" is 18-44 clocks)
> 
> //Olle
> 
> Daniel M Church wrote:
> > dWait:  in a,(10h)
> >         rla
> >         jr c,dWait
> >         ret
> >
> > Is that inefficient?

-- 
Scott "_Wrath_" Dial
wrath@calc.org
ICQ#3608935
TimeCity Co-Lead Developer, AI - www.timecity.org
Member of TCPA - tcpa.calc.org
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

References:

Re: A83:STILL NEED HELP!

From: Daniel M Church <dchurch@mbhs.edu>

Re: A83:STILL NEED HELP!

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>