Re: A83: Re: 83 and 83+ ASM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: Re: 83 and 83+ ASM
> > On the subject of the 83+, how the hell do you use the built in
compiler?! I
> > can't get it to work...the manual gives very little information on it.
> > Actually, under a page...lol. Do you need to use the
GraphLink?...*feeling
> > ignorant* :-)
>
> Make a program; first line should be AsmPrgm (found in the catalog) and
> the rest is assembly (without the 83's End/0000/End codes). Compile it
> with AsmComp(prgmSOURCE,prgmASM), and run it with Asm(prgmASM) (both found
> in the catalog). So:
Hmmm... The TI-83+ has got MUCH better ASM support...
The TI-83's is terrible... Every program is at least twice as long as the
actual program size (because every byte takes 2 bytes to store). And you
have to start programs with send(9prgmNAME... Aargh!!! (imitating Tarzan)...
Who the hell made this up? I mean, send( is hard to reach (only in catalog?
it is when not inserting it in a loader program I think. In a program it's
simply in the prgm menu), and 9.. well sorry but it's a crime.
~Grauw
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
email me: laurensh@geocities.com or ICQ: 10196372
visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
MSX fair Bussum / MSX Marathon homepage: http://msxfair.cjb.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Follow-Ups:
References: