Re: A83: Rom Calls

Re: A83: Rom Calls

• To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A83: Rom Calls
• From: mhlandry <mhlandry@bellsouth.net>
• Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 19:36:17 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
• Organization: Personal CPU
• References: <19990720225126.52563.qmail@hotmail.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Scott, where did you get the source that uses "the bug"?  And, although
I'm sure this question has been answered already, I cannot recollect the
answer nor can I find the email in which the answer is, so: what is the
problem with using that bug that lets you overwrite certain parts of the
memory?  Thanks again for all help and explanations.
	- Matt

James Vernon wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 22:55:12 EDT, RedPicasso@aol.com wrote:
> 
> >The reason TI has made these rom calls this way is so that all programs
> >will
> >run on all versions of the rom.  if _clrLCDfull is at $0031 on version
> >1.0700
> >it could be at $0045 on version 1.0800...  so TI made "entry points" so
> >that
> >all progs should work on all versions of the rom.
> 
>   Thanx for the explanation guys... this makes sense. I was wondering what
> the relocations were for.. cya's later.
> 
> James Vernon
> jimbob_v@hotmail.com
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

• Re: A83: Rom Calls
• From: mhlandry <mhlandry@bellsouth.net>

• Re: A83: Rom Calls
• From: "James Vernon" <jimbob_v@hotmail.com>

• Prev: Re: A83: Rom Calls
• Next: Re: A83: Rom Calls
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread