Re: A83: (no subject)

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: (no subject)
From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 14:58:07 -0500
References: <0.790e4390.25951f73@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

But there _should_ have been a year zero, mathematically, so... I guess its
just one of those things... like the 20th century refers to the 1900's, not
the 2000's.

So does the term 20th century refer to 1901-2000? :)

--
Bryan Rabeler
rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu
http://www.msu.edu/~rabelerb/

"The last thing we want is a "cover-up."  ...there's no reason to take out
intelligent and purely speculative posts. Even if they're true." - Chris
Dornfeld, 4 November 1998

----- Original Message -----
From: <ASimPerson@aol.com>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: A83: (no subject)

>
>         I know this is a bit of controversey, but the new millennium (as
well
> as the century) doesn't begin until the year 2001, because there was not a
> year zero. Other than that, y'all have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New
Year.
>
> In a message dated 12/24/99 12:26:05 PM Central Standard Time,
> EddieIke@aol.com writes:
>
> << Have a wonderful Christmas and a Happy New Millennium to you all. >>
>
>
> <A HREF="mailto:asimperson@aol.com">ASimPerson</A>
> <A HREF="mailto:asimweb@aol.com">ASimWeb</A>
> <A HREF="http://asimweb.tripod.com">http://asimweb.tripod.com</A>
>
>
>

References:

Re: A83: (no subject)

From: ASimPerson@aol.com