Re: A83: Platforms

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83: Platforms
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 14:22:06 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <370EDFC5.13514B5E@geocities.com>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


On 10-Apr-99, you wrote:


> Why would you need 6144 bytes??? I been writing a 3D program and I don't
> need any kind of buffer... Only the data of what to be displayed

> Linus Akesson wrote:
>> with chunky gfx at a 96*64 resolution will need a chunky buffer of 6144 bytes!
> -- 
> Scott "_Wrath_" Dial
> homosapian@geocities.com
> ICQ#3608935
> http://www.geocities.com/~homosapian/

I said "with chunky gfx".

Linus
-- 
                                                           wwww 
                                                          (o)(O)
.-->                                           .-------mm--(__)--mm--------.
| Linus Akesson                                | http://linusworld.cjb.net |
`---------------^-- ----- --- --  -- -  -   -  `---------ooO--Ooo----------'
      If you want to eat hippopatomus, you've got to pay the freight.
  -- attributed to an IBM guy, about why IBM software uses so much memory

References:

Re: A83: Platforms

From: Scott Dial <homosapian@geocities.com>

Prev: Re: A83: What is the best TI-83 assembly OS?
Next: Re: A83: NEW GAME IDEA!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread