Re: A83: calls

Re: A83: calls

• To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A83: calls
• From: Jkhum98@aol.com
• Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 23:24:01 EDT
• Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Don't you just have to do the appropriate number of "ret"s in the many threads
of your calls...? Well, I can tell you that this Example would not work as it
is. Just put a "ret" after every call you make, but if you put one after "call
second_label" that should be the end of the program and return to the OS. I
think its possible in this manner, but now I have a question coming off this.
You could not do a Jump in there anywhere? You would have to return from your
call first to do this correctly, right...?
																	--Jason K.
>
>Is it legal to make a call within a call? For example:
>
>
>first_label:
>     call second_label
>
>second_label:
>     call third label
>
>third_label:
>     ret
>
>From: Chris
>mecad@scv.net
>

• Re: A83: calls
• From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>

• Prev: A83: calls
• Next: Re: A83: calls
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread