Re: A83: Re: Where is...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: Re: Where is...
That sounds like it could work... I'll have to investigate it. I'm not sure
how much more/less memory that would take up though.
Joe Wingbermuehle
http://www.usmo.com/~joewing/
-----Original Message-----
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
To: Joe Wingbermuehle <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Monday, October 19, 1998 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: A83: Re: Where is...
>
>For every 768 bytes of data, ldir it to plotsscreen, _delmem the original
>data, then _insertmem it at 9327h. You're left with the program loaded at
>9327, an empty program file and an intact symtab!
>
>Linus
>
>On 18-Oct-98, Joe Wingbermuehle wrote:
>
>>I doubt any system routines would do the $9327<->program swap and update
the
>>vat... what use would the calc have for something like that?
>>I could write a nice routine to handle the vat updating, but I think it
>>would probably just be a waste of space. Most programs don't need the vat
>>corrected and those that do could correct the vat themselves.
>
>>Joe Wingbermuehle
>>http://www.usmo.com/~joewing/
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
>>To: Joe Wingbermuehle <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
>>Date: Sunday, October 18, 1998 4:46 PM
>>Subject: Re: A83: Re: Where is...
>
>
>>>
>>>On 18-Oct-98, Joe Wingbermuehle wrote:
>>>
>>>>It wouldn't be practical because you'd have to rewrite the vat to point
to
>>>>the correct locations since SOS and AShell move the data around to allow
>>all
>>>>of the ram to be used to its fullest. Fixing the vat wouldn't be too
>>>>difficult I suppose, but it would be useless for the most part.
>>>
>>>Yes, but when you move the data around, can't you do that with the system
>>>routines, which would update the vat? And you could probably figure out
>>some
>>>nice way of using the _adj#? routines aswell.
>>>
>>>Linus
>>>
>
>
>
Follow-Ups: