Re: A83: Re: subprogs

To: James Matthews <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A83: Re: subprogs
From: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 12:10:16 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-83-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <199807241837.DAA02010@tkb.att.ne.jp>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

On 24-Jul-98, James Matthews wrote:

>> 
>> What's so terribly tough with that? Never used an array of >300 items?
>> 
>> Linus
>> 

>Have you?!...C++ yeah, PASCAL yeah, Java yeah...ASM, hell no.

>James.

Plotsscreen is 768 bytes, but it's a bitmap so it's an array of 6144 items of
one bit each. And if you don't accept that as being an array (which it is), I
can tell you that when working on RiDE, I temporarily used a chunky array of
6144 *bytes*, which I later downsized to 3072 bytes.

Linus

References:

Re: A83: Re: subprogs

From: "James Matthews" <matthews@tkb.att.ne.jp>

Prev: A83: A routine to move data...
Next: Re: A83: A routine to move data...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread