RE: A83: Re: Re: TI-83 Programming
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A83: Re: Re: TI-83 Programming
Backup saves no space. It still uses RAM, it's just amatter of how it's used. There's no way of making a program use no memory, as it would then cease to exist. To make it not use RAM, you would have to reburn the ROM I've never seen the FileManager, and the real issue is adding that header data to the asm code. What I'd like to try is to make Aurora more usgard (85 shell) like in that it has a kernal separated from the shell/interface. However, we have to make it a lot smaller :)
Also, CUI stands for Character User Interface, like DOS or straight UNIX.
Christopher Kalos
raptorone@geocities.com
raptor_one@hotmail.com
Executive Director/Administrator
Virtual Technologies Developer's Group
----------
From: Jonathan Bates[SMTP:tilists@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 1997 12:10 AM
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A83: Re: Re: TI-83 Programming
What is a CUI? I agree that we do not need a backup shell but a Z-Shell
type program w/ a description heading next to the title of the program
is good. I agree that we can use Aurora's programming to detect the
ASM/BASIC programs. I only suggested backup because it would save all
27188 bytes for programs available to the user instead of a taking half
just for the CUI. A Windows-style file manager would be interesting.
BTW, does anyone know how Matt Renfrow is doing with the Aurora File
Manager PUD?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- Warning
- Could not process part with given Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef