Re: A82: argh.. really dumb question

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: argh.. really dumb question
From: "Wouter Demuynck" <kadem@online.be>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 19:57:03 +4
Delivered-To: assembly-82-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-reply-to: <36154100.49367265@omega.uta.edu>
References: <199810021959.OAA02206@dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org


> 
> "ld (hl),hl" is a silly instruction if you think about it.  all it
> would do is store the address of itself.  i'm not sure the best way,
> but you could do:
> 
> Code:
>  ....
>  ld hl,Array
>  ld de,50		; replace 10 with 50
>  ld (hl),d
>  inc hl
>  ld (hl),e

I think this should be ld(hl),e \ inc hl \ ld (hl),d instead. Words are stored 
backwards, remember?

>  ....
> 
> Array:
>  .dw 10,20,30,40

Wouter Demuynck  |  kadem@online.be
ICQ#4538550 | http://come.to/knurft

References:

A82: argh.. really dumb question

From: "moonbeem" <moonbeem@ix.netcom.com>

Re: A82: argh.. really dumb question

From: mgp4007@omega.uta.edu (Michael Pearce)

Prev: Re: A82: argh.. really dumb question
Next: Re: A82: argh.. really dumb question
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread