> 2) I think I heard somewhere that if you use a ROM_CALL more than three > times, it's more efficient to call it, since a call takes 2 bytes and a > ROM_CALL takes 3 (?). Also, I have tried substuting the call with the > ROM_CALL and there was no difference. a ROM_CALL takes 5 bytes, a call (3 bytes) and a .dw Addr (2 bytes) Wouter