Re: A82: Shell Analysis
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A82: Shell Analysis
THRBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB (supposed to sound like tongue out and spitting or
however you would describe that)
~Adamman
In a message dated 98-06-29 03:18:59 EDT, you write:
> Cmutr@aol.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 98-06-28 12:33:10 EDT, you write:
> >
> > <<
> > Hey dude, I'm not "mad" at you or anything. I'm just,
> > y'know, telling you what I think. Anyways, I think that
> > this should be a ticalc.org survey question:
> >
> > "Are more assembly shells good or bad for a calculator?"
> >
> > A) Good
> > B) Bad
> > C) Undecided/Don't care
> >
> > Then we'd have a better idea of what everyone thinks of this, not just
> > people like me who talk a lot. :)
> >
> > -Kouri
> > >>
> >
> > BAD- we should have one so all programs can be run on it, and maybe make
> it
> > work with add on components to suit everyones needs-then everyone can
make
> the
> > misc. components that can be added to it as .exe files that modify the
> > program- like AOL upgrades (sort of)
>
> Just what we need is an AOLer telling us to make TI shells like AOL's
> software. :)
>
> --
> Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> File Archives, HTML, and Support
> the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/