Re: A82: ASH 3.1
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A82: ASH 3.1
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
> At 06:07 PM 6/10/98 -0400, you wrote:
> >Was that a ORDER, sir? :)
> >
> >Sean Creasy wrote:
> >
> >> PLEASE RELEASE ASH 3.1 SOON!!!
>
> No, but I'm probably just as anxious for ASH 3.1 to be released as everyone
> else on this list...including you. Why don't you just release beta 2 and
> most of us (at least I will) be happy until the complete version is released.
>
> Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
> http://shinelight.home.ml.org
No. Because 1) Dines doesn't want a lot of beta copies floating around and 2)
Dines doesn't want complaints that Ash 3.1 Beta 2 doesn't work perfectly. So why
not just wait until a completed, thoughly-tested, working version is done?
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, HTML, and Support
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
Follow-Ups:
References: