Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:26:21 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-82-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <c1fb2afb.35bfe9e8@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org


Cw9000@aol.com wrote:
> 
> ok    this thread is getting dumb.   Backwards compatibility is only an issue
> if there is a reason to have backwards compatibility.  The question Dines
> asked is if anyone uses the prgm command in their program    if nobody
> does/has    then it should definately be taken out.  And I don't think it has
> been used  and I personally like starting Ash anyway  just to see which games
> are in Asm easily.
> 
> /--- craig w. ---/

Backwards compatibility is a very important issue.  If Dines ever
changes the format for programs, like what happened from 2.0 to 3.0,
then take it out.  Else, leave it in.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

References:

Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again

From: Cw9000@aol.com