Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 13:02:14 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-82-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <b1edf5c6.35bc8c7c@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org


Leave it in then...

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, HTML, Features, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

ADAMMAN106@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Then you have a new problem: programs that use the prgm command feature will
> not work with the Ash 3.1 that does not support this function, so two versions
> of every program will have to be made.  You wouldn't be able to tell the
> difference between the two different programs and this could lead to Bad
> Things
> 
> ~Adamman
> 
> In a message dated 98-07-27 00:02:27 EDT, you write:
> 
> > Maybe you can make two versions of ASH 3.1.
> >  On Sun, 26 Jul 1998 23:33:04 -0400 "Ahmed El-Helw"
> >  <ahmedre@bellsouth.net> writes:
> >  >
> >  >i beg to differ.. I think you should take it out, because me and all
> >  >my
> >  >friends at school that I hooked up simply run Ash and the program.
> >  >And 50
> >  >bytes is a lot on an 82 like calculator w/limited memory.
> >  >                                                            -Ahmed
> >  >
> >  >--
> >  >Ahmed El-Helw
> >  >ahmedre@bellsouth.net
> >  >http://asm8x.home.ml.org
> >  >ICQ: 3350394
> >  >
> >  >-----Original Message-----
> >  >From: owner-assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
> >  >[mailto:owner-assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Duy C Nguyen
> >  >Sent: Sunday, July 26, 1998 10:09 PM
> >  >To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
> >  >Subject: Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >I think that you should stick with the prgm command, because it's
> >  >simpler
> >  >to use.  50 bytes is not that much, and I think that people will find
> >  >it
> >  >easier to use.
> >  >
> >  >On Mon, 27 Jul 1998 03:25:37 +0200 (METDST) Dines Christy Justesen
> >  ><c958362@student.dtu.dk> writes:
> >  >>
> >  >>I was wondering whether anyone uses the posibility to use the prgm
> >  >>commond
> >  >>to start asm programs. If no one uses it I might as well remove and
> >  >>make
> >  >>Ash app. 50 bytes smaller. What do you think, should I remove it ?
> >  >>
> >  >>After a bit of testing I am now sure that the problem with penguins
> >  >>crashing is caused by the differences in the relocationmethod. So
> >  >>hopefully it should not take too long to correct it.
> >  >>
> >  >>Dines
> >  >>
> >  >>__________________________________________
> >  >>
> >  >>Dines Justesen
> >  >>Email: c958362@student.dtu.dk
> >  >>WWW  : http://www.student.dtu.dk/~c958362/
> >  >>__________________________________________
> >  >>
> >  >>
> >  >
> >  >_____________________________________________________________________
> >  >You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> >  >Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> >  >Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >  _____________________________________________________________________
> >  You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> >  Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> >  Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

References:

Re: A82: Ash 3.1 again

From: ADAMMAN106@aol.com