Re: A82: Solytare for the 82
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A82: Solytare for the 82
In a message dated 98-01-14 12:34:13 EST, you write:
> >
> > The display on the 82 is slower than it is on the 85 (which i
> > orginally programmed it for) and flickered badly so i had to add in
> > some halt instructions in the main loop of the game and this made it
> > where i had to increase the rate the cursor moved. and, i could not
> > have kept the size of the card the same. the display width of the 82
> > is 96 pixels. the cards on the 85/6 version are 16 pixels wide. 16
> > pixels * 7 rows of cards = 112. 112 is > 96. don't blame that on me.
> > and '10' is too wide to fit on the card in the given amount of pixels
> > i had to use. You cannot put the suit picture in the middle of the
> > card since it will not be able to be seen when it is below another
> > card. BTW, if you don't like it, i am not going to force you to play
> > it. If you think it sucks so badly, please don't play. I am *sure*
> > that you can make your own, better solitaire game. I don't even own
> > an 82. i just thought that some people might enjoy the game if i
> > converted it to the 82. sorry if this game is not up to your
> > standards. (and i know that i replied to both people's messages in
> > this one.)
> >
> > -mike pearce
> > mgp4007@omega.uta.edu
> >
> ok, Mr. Pearce, i have nothing against you, i've enjoyed playing solytare
> for both the 85 and 86, and they are both great versions. i just thought
> if you took the time to make it use ALL of the screen, instead of
> shrinking the cards, it would've been better. i do unsderstand why u have
> the suit at the corner, though.
> i apologize for the stinging nature of
> the last email, but i was in a bad mood that day, and i shouldn't have
> taken it out on you or your game. sorry.
>
> maybe if you made it for Ccccc, the flicker would be less visible.
>
>
> and to kill two birds with one stone---, Adamman-- are you going to add 2
> player capability to SameGame (action mode, # of blocks cleared-1=# sent)?
> that'd be pretty cool.
I'm not planning on it.
maybe we'll take a vote...who wants it, who doesn't?
~Adamman
Follow-Ups: