A82: Re: GWv2.0 bug/ASHv3.0 bug
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A82: Re: GWv2.0 bug/ASHv3.0 bug
I have been concidering another possibility. I am still working on Ash
4.0, and it will take some time to finish it (real relocation is actually
hard to do), but i could release a small update of Ash (3.1). This could
solve the problem with large programs, and I could document simpel
relocation so making Game Wizard work would be no problem at all. Both of
these things are very easy to do so if anyone is interested i can do it.
(It might be possible to use some VAR functions too).
Is anyone intersted ? Is it worth spending the time on it ?
Dines
BTW I do think that 2 shells is enough, a 3rd would just mean more
problems with different versions of the programs.
-----Original Message-----
From: CrASH Staff <crash.staff@mailexcite.com>
To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: 10. februar 1998 22:01
Subject: A82: GWv2.0 bug/ASHv3.0 bug
>
>
>Whatever the problem is (the shell or game wizard), why don't you do
something about
>it?
>
>Barubary and I have been too lazy recently and school is becoming a pain
so CrASH
>2.0 with advanced relocation (the same as your suggestion kind of, except
using a
>couple ROM_CALLs, that will perform VAT compatible relocation) will take
another
>while... Meanwhile, why don't you TRY to make a shell? You'll see how
Dines feels
>about this subject and how Baru and I feel too. (It is so painful to do
correct
>relocation)
>
>Anyways, this relocation stuff is a mess, and so if you want to prove
your point,
>the best way is to actually make your own shell. I don't want to deal
with anything
>besides simple (simpel) relocation. For the most part, Baru is doing
this tough
>job. :)
>
> -- CrASH_Man
>
>
>
>Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
>http://www.mailexcite.com
>
_______________________________________
Dines Justesen
Email: dines@post1.com or
c958362@student.dtu.dk
WWW : http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c958362/
_______________________________________
Follow-Ups: