A82: Re:
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A82: Re:
in other words it would be alot easier to learn ASM =)
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997 16:24:42 -0500 (EST) ESDavid@aol.com writes:
>Well, not exactly. First of all, cout is a C++ command. It is doing
>much
>more than printing "Hello" or whatever to the screen. It is putting
>that
>data into a stream, which is sent to standard out, or the screen (more
>or
>less). Writing a C++ compiler for the calc would not be the greatest
>idea,
>since C++ is designed to make large applications easier to write and
>reuse
>code, not write small games.
>
>If you do write a standard C compiler, you would most likely use
>printf. You
>would take
>
>printf("Hello, World");
>
>and turn it into
>
> LD HL, (PROGRAM_ADDR)
> LD DE, STRING1
> ADD HL, DE
> CALL PRINTF
>
>STRING1:
> .DB "Hello, World!", 0
>
>
>This is a basic idea of what the compiler would do. You would have to
>rewrite the printf function to call the rom function to write to the
>screen.
> I hope this helps.
>
>
>David Phillips
>esdavid@aol.com
>
>
><<
> so I make it to where the libs turn cout << "Hello"; to db.
>"Hello",0
>
> On Sun, 26 Oct 1997 11:16:26 +0100 "Dines Justesen"
> <c958362@student.dtu.dk> writes:
> > C compilers have been made and are working for the TI85, so i can
>not
> >imagine why it should be so hard to make on for the TI82. As far as
>i
> >can
> >see all you have to do is to rewrite the libs.
> >
> >Dines
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bennie R Copeland <prince.endymion@juno.com>
> >To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Date: 26. oktober 1997 00:38
> >Subject: A82: Re:
> >
> >
> >
> >>oh ok =)
> >>
> >>On Sat, 25 Oct 1997 13:41:01 -0700 Matt Maurano <maurano@best.com>
> >>writes:
> >>>Next to impossible, and if possible, next to useless. prog82.exe
> >>>simply adds
> >>>the necessary ti82 header to make any z80 object code file into an
>
> >82
> >>>program. If you had a C complier that required no overhead on the
> >>>calc, and
> >>>could make z80 code, it would probably work. However, You are
> >probably
> >>>better
> >>>using asm, as C could be hard to adapt to the TI.
> >>>
> >>>Bennie R Copeland wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> how plausible is it to write a program in C or C++ compile into
>an
> >>>object
> >>>> file and then use prog82.exe to make it into a ti 82 file?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >>
>
>
References: